openalice-ui
Architecture rating
Manifest present+valid, 75 features annotated, code_health and drift both 100/100, zero dependency cycles — strong convention adoption; docked for failing CI which breaks the contract with downstream consumers relying on consistent green builds.
Manifest present and valid with clear summary, 75 @feature annotations, Atlas card linked in README; docked for roadmap score of 30/100 (weakest axis per Atlas), minimal readme_excerpt, and no evidence of in-code architecture notes or contribution guide.
Library exposes AuthProvider (authn primitive) but no inspector run to verify token handling, XSS-safe rendering, or CSP headers; no evidence of secret-handling guardrails or rate-limit logic in a UI lib; graded conservatively on absent signal.
No inspector analysis to confirm error boundaries, retry logic in hooks, or graceful degradation patterns; CI conclusion is 'failure' on latest run (2026-07-05), indicating the library's build/test pipeline is currently broken — a reliability red flag for downstream consumers.
No tables owned (manifest_owns_tables=[]), expected for a UI library; no schema, migrations, or RLS to evaluate — axis is largely N/A but scored conservatively since there is zero evidence of any data-layer concern (e.g. client-side cache invalidation, optimistic-update safety).
No inspector run so test count and coverage are unknown; CI is currently failing (conclusion='failure'), meaning whatever tests exist are either broken or insufficient — cannot credit what cannot be verified.
No health endpoint (expected for a lib), but also no evidence of structured error reporting, performance marks, or telemetry hooks exported for consuming apps; latest_health probe returns error 'no https endpoint' — no observable surface at all.
source · auto-grader-2026-07-06
Telemetry ribbon · last 90 days
1 eventNo @feature annotations recorded in this repo yet.